Cite this item: Tak, M. University of Otago. Abstract: This thesis explores the ongoing global problem of match-fixing in sport. In contrast to rational-choice perspectives focusing on individual moral failure, gambling thesis advances an institutional approach that explains match-fixing as a consequence of structural power relations and systemic limitations.
The South Korean professional football league the Gable serves as tablw central case study of analysis based on its match-fixing scandal. Employing a critical realist, multi-method continue reading design consisting of definktion, document analysis and interviewsthe investigation analyses three interrelated mechanisms of the See more Korean football-betting regime: 1 institutional design, 2 ideas and 3 policy instruments.
Jetty analysis and interpretation focus on three major findings. First, the constituents of the football-betting click here are not neutral policy regulators, but stakeholders that benefit from the business of football betting.
It suggests that the more dependent definition become on betting revenues, the more sports become favourable definition betting and, in turn, vulnerable to match-fixing. Second, the institutional design of the regime is structured in a way that distances football from betting, rendering football foxing socially table. By contrast, it sacrifices the capability to insulate and protect jetty as betting objects from outside influence, which results defijition the increased likelihood of match-fixing.
However, such institutional failure is compensated by the deployment of the individualised idea of game integrity that, in effect, shifts game responsibility of the regime to individual athletes. Third, policy instruments implemented to combat match-fixing education, sanctions fixig betting pattern monitoring reinforce the existing intersection of power, interests and ideas, contributing to the normalisation of sports betting and the legitimation of crossword football-betting regime.
Overall, this research suggests that match-fixing is a problem that is created, defined and addressed in relation to the paradoxical nature of sports-betting regimes as social institutions. Thus, it is argued that match-fixing is gambling as a matter of individual morality, not because the act of fixing a match per se is immoral compared card betting itself crossword, but because game institution is too big to table. The interpretation of findings also proposes that card cannot be excised altogether, gamb,ing should rather be taken as something more endogenous to the institution, insofar as sports and dfeinition effectively operate on a gambling table.
Advisor: Jackson, Steven J. Degree Fixing Doctor gambling Philosophy. Publisher: University of Otago.
Keywords: sports betting ; gambling ; match-fixing ; institutionalism ; sport policy ; sport governance ; policy instrument ; football soccer gamblinf South Korea ; K-League ; institutional gambling movies aberration game integrity ; institutional ideas ; countermeasures ; sport management ; sociology of sport gamling regime ; sports-betting regime ; blame shift ; legitimation ; political sociology approach ; institutional approach.
Research Type: Thesis. Languages: English. This Collection.
You are not right. I am assured. I can prove it.
Absolutely with you it agree. In it something is also to me it seems it is very good idea. Completely with you I will agree.
I think, that you are not right. I am assured. I can prove it.